Bold Representation When Freedom Is at Stake
Acosta Law's criminal defense practice was founded on the principle that quality legal representation should never be contingent on wealth or status. We understand that the power imbalance in criminal proceedings demands zealous representation that leaves no stone unturned in the defense of our clients.
We approach each case with a commitment to thorough investigation, creative legal strategy, and uncompromising advocacy. Our attorneys have successfully defended clients against charges ranging from minor infractions to serious felonies, often achieving dismissals, acquittals, or favorable plea agreements where conventional wisdom suggested otherwise.
Our Criminal Defense Services
Drug Offenses
We defend clients facing all types of drug charges, from simple possession to complex trafficking allegations. Our approach combines aggressive motion practice, thorough investigation, and scientific knowledge to challenge the prosecution's case.
- Possession and possession with intent
- Manufacturing and cultivation
- Distribution and trafficking
- Prescription drug violations
- Asset forfeiture defense
White Collar Crimes
Our white collar practice defends individuals and organizations facing allegations of financial crimes. We specialize in navigating complex investigations and developing strategic defenses in document-intensive cases.
- Fraud and embezzlement
- Money laundering
- Securities violations
- Tax evasion
- Public corruption
Civil Disobedience Defense
With deep roots in the defense of political activists, we represent those who engage in civil disobedience and face criminal charges as a result of their advocacy. We understand the intersection of criminal defense and constitutional protection.
- Protest-related arrests
- Trespass and disorderly conduct
- First Amendment protection strategy
- Necessity defense implementation
Federal Criminal Defense
Federal prosecutions require specialized knowledge and experience. Our attorneys have extensive experience in federal court, understanding the unique rules, procedures, and sentencing guidelines that distinguish federal practice.
- Federal drug prosecutions
- RICO and conspiracy cases
- Federal firearms offenses
- Sentencing guidelines expertise
The Acosta Approach to Criminal Defense
Our defense philosophy is shaped by both legal expertise and a deep understanding of the institutional forces that drive the criminal justice system. Our approach includes:
- Aggressive Motion Practice: We file strategic motions to suppress evidence, dismiss charges, and exclude prejudicial material, seeking to eliminate the prosecution's case before trial whenever possible.
- Independent Investigation: We never rely solely on the prosecution's evidence. Our team conducts thorough independent investigations, often uncovering crucial exculpatory evidence the government has overlooked or ignored.
- Scientific Rigor: We subject all forensic evidence to rigorous scientific scrutiny, consulting with leading experts to challenge unproven methodologies and flawed analysis.
- Jury Psychology: Our trial presentations are informed by cutting-edge research in cognitive psychology and narrative theory, allowing us to communicate effectively with jurors.
- Alternative Resolution: When appropriate, we pursue diversion programs, treatment alternatives, and restorative justice approaches that address underlying issues while avoiding the collateral consequences of criminal convictions.
Notable Criminal Defense Cases
State of Nevada v. Ramirez (2021)
Won dismissal of all charges in a complex narcotics trafficking case after demonstrating serious Fourth Amendment violations in the execution of search warrants.
United States v. Johnson (2018)
Secured acquittal at trial for a client facing federal conspiracy charges carrying a mandatory minimum of 15 years, successfully challenging the credibility of cooperative witnesses and the reliability of electronic evidence.
People v. Westbrook (2016)
Negotiated the dismissal of serious felony charges for a protest organizer by demonstrating selective prosecution and presenting compelling evidence of First Amendment-protected activity.
